Democracy Democracy

Democracy is the best system, and every country should become democratic. It is the only system apart from Communism, which thinks about the whole population every child and every person. Communism, we all know has too many faults such as a lack of representation, so gets beaten, and has some of the lord of the flies style problems of monarchy and fascism. The only other forms of government. Intresting facts include how India is now richer than Pakistan, and Nepal, because it is a democracy. That Costa Rica the most democratic history in Latin America, of the 20th C, has it's highest life expectancy. That the land with the highest life expectancy in South East Asia, is Mauritius, it's most democratic place. The place with the highest Life expectancy in East Asia, Japan, the land with the longest democratic history there. The Most highest life expectancy in Europe are Andorra, and San Marino, which have both had forms of democracy, with almost universal male suffrage since the Middle ages. They have higher LEs even than Monaco, and Liechtenstein. So 2 immoral tax havens, which accept billions in cash from casinos, and rich, have lower LE,s than San Marino which closed it's casino as it decided it was immoral, and Liechtensetin which takes billions every decade or so in immoral earnings from dictators. Yes these last 2 lands are quite democartic, but they also have evil brakes on democarcy their monarchies, who cause micschief. Which have the highest LEs, in Africa, well untill recently Botswana, but Aids, and HIV which was so added too by the failings of Apartrhied, had the highest LE. HIV was caused by Apartheid, and it's wars, worsening South Africa, and making it so unequal. Which saw Botswana, and the rest of Southern Africa, see falls in LE. The least democratic land in Southern Africa, Swasilanmd, had the highest rate of HIV, and lowest Life expectancy,. But now it is the longest democratic history in Africa, other than Botswana, Senegal. Yes democracy can create probelems, but every time it is always better. No matter how bad things are,. they can always be worse under monarchy or dictatorship. Look at 1930s Germany, right wing politicians, claimed democarcy had failed, as of high unemployment. Fortgetting that dictatorship had caused WW1 which had caused alligned with Russia and Austria causing this war, more deaths than the entire German population. They won the election claiming democracy had failed, not remembering that neighbouring European dictatorships were also experiencing deeper recessions, and that the least worst suffering lands at the time were democarcies. So they manages to wrongly convince people, that democracy was wrong. What do these strong men rulers do, they cause the evilest regime ever,. So people who oppose democracy are supporting a evil.

In Arabia, what is the cause of the terrorism, that hurst the world at the moment, Well the regime in Riyadh, The most undemocratic regime on Earth. Who do their terrorists attack, the democracies. Look at Iraq, some may say this is a failure for democarcy, but lets face it it is not that much. It is a failure of US occupation, and soldiers holding sway over another land. And if you say the Iraqis do not want democracy, then why do polls, say they do, and why are most of the suicide bombers from foreign dictatorships. Surely Iraq has seen loads of investment in civil war, from US troops, Riyadh, Iran, and Syria, but even then a civil war has not been able to erupt. Surely if Iraq had been made a dictatorship by the US, there would have been even more deaths. I think so.

Look at Eastern Europe, after Communism. The lands which have become more democartic after 1989, like in Eastern Europe, and Mongolia, have seen their LifExpectancys rise, and wealth rise. The lands which have become more undemocratic and unequal like in Central Asia, have seen their LEs fall. The best thing about democracy is that it can change the governments policies. Look at Eatsern Europe, the people were dissapointed with mass privatisastion, so were able to slow it, something they were unabl;e to do in Central Asia.

In Britain democracy beat child labour, and started welfare, rising the LE. It ended famine in Ireland, as after Ireland became democartic the government started investing in food.It ended the Clearances in the Highlands.

In the Middle East, the problem, is dictatoral ideaology and dictatorships. Islamists who want to end democarcy, and ignore the principles of equality, and corporate dictatorships, like many and Riyadh, who flip between supporting Islamists, and then claim they are it's greatest foes, usually at the same time. There is no doubt democarcy, and equality, and the UN are right.

So that is that. Democracy is needed everywhere.

Some Nazi dictatorships today say "we are npt ready for democfracy" if that is so, that is another reason for outsing them. They claim Britain EVOLVED into a democracy. This is not true, Britain did not eveolve into one, the people, wanted one, and the elite did not. It only took so long as the kings and elites opposed it. These lands could become demoratic very quickly. no doubt about that.

Dictators always say, "our people can not rulw, we are too far behind you to become a democarcy if these people are so thick" why should they have absolute rulers, surely if that is true, surely just one of them can not rule. Surely the people who have the confidenec in tehri nation should rule, not the people who dragged their nation downm to that level.

Right wingers say who are you to say this land should be a democracy, to major figures, and normal citizens, they can say I am me, and say well who are you to say it should not be, and to rule, and i am me, to say it,

Putins lot condemn democarcy, but the guy who failed in the 1990s appointed him, They say Russia, can not be a democarcy, as of 80 years of Communism, well Ukrainme, and Georgia had 80 years of Communism, so did Mongolia, plus more Nazi, rule, and colonial oppression, and tsarist rule afore then

I am fed up of people claiming Iraq was invaded for democarcy, come on it was invaded as of weapons of mass destricuon, and revenge

dEMOCRACY IS PROVEN TO BE CORRECT AS LOOK AT wEIMAR gERMANY never matter how bad it was it was never as bad as the Kaiser Maonrch's World War One, or the Nazi Dictators' world war two, Democracy then showed what it was really about after WW2, not just better but much much better.

In Mid 2007, most Iraqis feel all neighbours are destablisaing for them, all are dictatorship,s lands neighboured by dems do not feel so, even in 2007, democracy is what most Iraqis want for IRaq in 5 years time, even in 2007, after loads of terrorists and more attacks, MOST IRAQIS want democracy, never matter how bad it can be it can only get worse under dictatorship, so the patronising view that democracy is not right for Iraq is just like when people say that about every land, some rightists said Britain, USA, Spain, Germany Russia Japan South America could not be democracies, they were ALL proven wrong, yes righists said in 1840s Britain, that British people should not have the vote as of them being different to Americans, who had the vote then, And America's worst probelsm of the 19th C were caused by undemocratic anti-equality ideas, like slavery,

more sites, there are books and articles on the subjects in many internet places, or internet book shops, bookstores, at the bottom, are lists of which were the worst regimes of the past few centuries.

100S OF GREAT WEBSITES http://www.info-facts.com/

A site on the El Nino Famines that killed 10s of millions of Indians, and Chinese and others in the 19th Century

The Highland Clearances and it's full terribleness

A site on the Belgian Congo, and how the king of that land killed 10s of millions of Congolese

Why the French Revolution was good

The most evil regimes of the 19th Century

A site on 1640s Britain

Worst 18th Century regimes

What were the nicest regimes ever

The Best regimes ever in terms of achievers

Worst 17th Century regimes ever

A site stating what have been the world's largest empires ever